Road · road.general-reasoning@1.0.0

The General Reasoning Road

Survival 100% Challenges

AGI requires human-machine commensurability—shared reasoning structures that both can read, write, and verify. Scaling alone won't get us there; we need operational language, adversarial testing, and operator-auditor separation.

14 claims · 14 surviving · 0 contested

Claims

C-0009 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0011

AGI cannot be achieved through scaling alone. Current frontier models demonstrate impressive pattern-matching but cannot reliably reason in ways humans can verify, audit, or trust.

C-0001 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0001
  • T-0002

LLMs perform N-dimensional Bayesian accounting that humans cannot; they handle hundreds or thousands of dimensions effortlessly while humans max out at 5-7 items.

C-0010 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0012

General reasoning requires commensurability—the ability for humans and machines to understand each other's reasoning and verify each other's conclusions using shared structures.

C-0002 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0003
  • T-0004

Operational language creates a shared data structure that both humans and LLMs can use without divergence, converging the plane of reciprocal information exchange into words.

C-0011 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0013

The Tower of Babel problem in AI is not about different languages but about different reasoning grammars. Translation between natural language and operational language enables mutual understanding.

C-0008 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0010

AIs excel at low-dimensional closure domains (math, programming, physics) but struggle with high-dimensional closure domains (governance, law, ethics). This grammar solves high-dimensional closure.

C-0003 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0005

The evolution of reasoning proceeds from association to explanation to justification to falsification to adversarialism—Darwinian survival of claims through staged tests.

C-0012 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0014

Truth cannot be determined by consensus, authority, or persuasion. It can only be determined by survival under adversarial test—claims that withstand challenges from motivated opponents.

C-0005 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0005

Constructive logic from first principles is another form of falsification—building from the bottom up exposes what you are missing.

C-0004 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0006
  • T-0007

Claims must pass survival hurdles: true, ethical, possible, warrantable, liable. If a claim cannot pass these gates, it cannot survive as testimony.

C-0006 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0008

The machine performs Bayesian measurement across unlimited dimensions, then reduces output to human-verifiable checklists—intersubjectively testable criteria.

C-0007 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0009

We have created a means of commensurability with machines, and machines with us, and a standard by which humans can be commensurable with one another—enabling decidability regardless of background or bias.

C-0013 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0015

Operator-auditor separation prevents AI systems from both making claims and judging their truth. The machine that generates claims cannot be the machine that evaluates them.

C-0014 @1.0.0 surviving
  • T-0016

General reasoning emerges when machines can construct claims, predict consequences, survive tests, and be held accountable—the same standards we apply to testimony in law and science.


Challenge a Claim Submit Your Road