- T-0011
AGI cannot be achieved through scaling alone. Current frontier models demonstrate impressive pattern-matching but cannot reliably reason in ways humans can verify, audit, or trust.
AGI requires human-machine commensurability—shared reasoning structures that both can read, write, and verify. Scaling alone won't get us there; we need operational language, adversarial testing, and operator-auditor separation.
AGI cannot be achieved through scaling alone. Current frontier models demonstrate impressive pattern-matching but cannot reliably reason in ways humans can verify, audit, or trust.
LLMs perform N-dimensional Bayesian accounting that humans cannot; they handle hundreds or thousands of dimensions effortlessly while humans max out at 5-7 items.
General reasoning requires commensurability—the ability for humans and machines to understand each other's reasoning and verify each other's conclusions using shared structures.
Operational language creates a shared data structure that both humans and LLMs can use without divergence, converging the plane of reciprocal information exchange into words.
The Tower of Babel problem in AI is not about different languages but about different reasoning grammars. Translation between natural language and operational language enables mutual understanding.
AIs excel at low-dimensional closure domains (math, programming, physics) but struggle with high-dimensional closure domains (governance, law, ethics). This grammar solves high-dimensional closure.
The evolution of reasoning proceeds from association to explanation to justification to falsification to adversarialism—Darwinian survival of claims through staged tests.
Truth cannot be determined by consensus, authority, or persuasion. It can only be determined by survival under adversarial test—claims that withstand challenges from motivated opponents.
Constructive logic from first principles is another form of falsification—building from the bottom up exposes what you are missing.
Claims must pass survival hurdles: true, ethical, possible, warrantable, liable. If a claim cannot pass these gates, it cannot survive as testimony.
The machine performs Bayesian measurement across unlimited dimensions, then reduces output to human-verifiable checklists—intersubjectively testable criteria.
We have created a means of commensurability with machines, and machines with us, and a standard by which humans can be commensurable with one another—enabling decidability regardless of background or bias.
Operator-auditor separation prevents AI systems from both making claims and judging their truth. The machine that generates claims cannot be the machine that evaluates them.
General reasoning emerges when machines can construct claims, predict consequences, survive tests, and be held accountable—the same standards we apply to testimony in law and science.